
Still Trying to Support a Multi-Protocol
Network?
The World is Going IP, Are You?!
There are many good reasons to
do so:
¨
Enhance performance
throughout your network
¨
Add functionality to existing
applications
¨
Eliminate problematic
multi-protocol network support
¨
Save money by
operating an efficient and optimized network
Is there a downside? Well, if you have Twinax cabling and devices
and are thinking of moving to a LAN environment, you have a lot to think about.
For example, will your trusty IPDS printers continue to perform? Will your data
entry personnel continue to be productive? Will your network be as reliable?
Following
is a discussion of four different options available to you. Click the links to
learn the pros and cons of each option, and to discover which solution is right
for your organization:
Pros
|
Cons
|
|
¨ Share printers with LAN users and PC applications |
¨ Possible complex networking issues |
|
¨ More expensive to manage, cost of PC management very high |
¨ Disruption / lost production |
|
¨ Access to multiple applications |
¨ Cost of replacement |
|
¨ Improved performance for WAN users |
¨ Retraining of personnel |
¨ Jadvantage (browser-based, no client install, great for remote access)
¨ BOSâNOVA TCP/IP (LAN-based, small footprint, feature-rich)
Pros
|
Cons
|
|
¨ Less expensive than option 1 |
¨ No additional applications supported |
|
¨ Remote management keeps cost of ownership lower |
¨ Cost of replacement |
|
¨ No retraining required |
¨ Disruption / lost production |
|
¨ Keep investment in Twinax Printers |
|
|
¨ Improved performance for WAN users |
|
¨ BOSâNOVA TBT-400 (high performance Ethernet text-based terminals)
¨ e-TwinPrint or low-end e-Twin@x Controller (to maintain workhorse Twinax printers)
Pros
|
Cons
|
|
¨ Access to server based applications |
¨ Replacement cost |
|
¨ Low cost of ownership (software maintained only on server) |
¨ Disruption / loss of production |
|
¨ Embedded Terminal emulation for server independence |
¨ Cost of Fat Server |
|
¨ 122-key keyboard option comforts users |
¨ Cost of Server access |
|
¨ Lower power requirements than PC |
¨ Cost of replacement |
|
¨ Better MTBF than PC, no moving parts |
|
|
¨ Lower security risks (control download of data to diskette) |
|
|
¨ Better virus protection (control upload of unwanted programs) |
|
|
¨ Improved performance for WAN users |
|
¨ BOSâNOVA LTC-300 and BOSâNOVA LTC-600
Pros
|
Cons
|
|
¨ Maintain existing Terminals and Printers |
¨ No access to windows based applications |
|
¨ Little or no disruption / loss of production |
¨ Older technology (Twinax is not sexy) |
|
¨ Lower replacement cost in most cases |
|
|
¨ Improved performance for WAN users |
|
|
¨ Only one IP address required |
|
|
¨ No retraining required |
|
|
¨ Text based email available |
|
|
¨ Smoother implementation of disaster recovery (Dial back up, Hot spare, IP Rollover) |
|
|
¨ Ease of management (Http access to controller) |
|
¨ e-Twin@x Controller (the only true TCP/IP remote controller)
For more information about these solutions or to discuss
the specific needs of your enterprise, please contact us at:
(866) 865-5250 (toll free) ♦ sales@bosanova.net ♦ www.bosweb.com
